Meditation Is Not Universally Beneficial
Varol challenges the categorical claim that meditation works for everyone, citing research in which a portion of meditators reported adverse effects. The backlash to sharing that nuance illustrates how strongly people defend simple right-or-wrong categories, even when their stated practice promotes loose attachment.
- Some meditators report adverse effects
- A useful practice for many is not automatically useful for all
- Copying successful people's routines can create false expectations
- Categorical thinking leaves no room for individual context
“not everything is universally good even meditation is not universally good”
“this sort of like black white yes no right wrong thinking at least a lot of problems”