Free Speech Is Defensible Only When the Standard Stays Fixed
Galloway argues that an absolute free-speech position can be defensible, even for deeply offensive speech. His objection is selective enforcement: institutions lose credibility when their line moves according to which group is targeted.
- An absolute free-speech rule can be internally consistent
- Private universities must decide whether they actually model the First Amendment
- Selective enforcement is less defensible than a clear rule
- Institutional credibility depends on applying one standard
“what the president said in their Congressional testimony at the universities that was not defensible what saying that free speech is absolute is actually defensible…”
“what is not defensible is having a line that's more like plaid and that is the line constantly shifts based on the special interest group…”