Raise From Strength Rule
Take outside capital during proven growth, not desperate survival
- Difficulty
- Advanced
- Time to result
- ~months to results
- Steps
- 5
- Confidence
- 95%
The Raise From Strength Rule treats investment as fuel for an already moving business, not proof that the business deserves to exist. Bootstrap until customers establish demand, then identify the specific constraint capital can remove, such as inventory required to fulfil rapidly growing sales. Before accepting money, explicitly weigh additional reach against the possibility of losing control and being pressured away from the founder's truth or direction. Raise while growth is strong and the company is not desperate, because alternatives improve negotiating leverage and equity retention. Asprey used this sequence after bootstrapping Bulletproof to $27 million in revenue, but his later removal also illustrates that favourable timing reduces rather than eliminates investor-control risk. The rule therefore combines a timing test, a use-of-funds test, and a governance warning.
Origin
Asprey bootstrapped Bulletproof from $50,000 to $27 million in revenue, sought capital for coffee inventory during rapid growth, and later reflected on the control he ultimately lost.
Core principles
- 01Revenue proof improves negotiating power
- 02Capital is most useful against a specific growth constraint
- 03Money expands reach while increasing the risk of lost control
- 04A founder who is not desperate can protect more equity
How to run it
- 1
Prove demand first
Use customer revenue and repeat behaviour to establish that the company is growing for reasons beyond investor enthusiasm. Keep the initial operation as self-sustaining as practical.
Pro tip Track the evidence an investor cannot manufacture: orders, retention, and constrained fulfilment.
Watch out Fundraising before demand proof can hide a weak business model.
- 2
Name the bottleneck
Specify the asset, inventory, team, or distribution constraint the capital will remove. Quantify how that constraint currently limits validated sales.
Pro tip A good use-of-funds sentence links money directly to an observed growth limit.
Watch out General runway is a weaker negotiating story than a proven, removable constraint.
- 3
Price the control trade
Decide what governance, equity, and directional influence the capital buys. Consider whether broader reach is worth the possibility of future conflict.
Pro tip Model the disagreement case, not only the aligned honeymoon period.
Watch out Investor incentives may diverge from the founder's even when the current direction is shared.
- 4
Raise before desperation
Negotiate while the company has momentum, options, and time. Preserve the ability to reject terms that compromise the business.
Pro tip Begin conversations before the constrained resource becomes a survival emergency.
Watch out Waiting until cash is nearly exhausted transfers leverage to the investor.
- 5
Guard post-raise independence
Maintain clear governance, information rights, and founder boundaries after the deal. Revisit whether growth decisions still serve the company's intended direction.
Pro tip Document decision rights before personalities or incentives change.
Watch out Strong initial equity does not permanently protect board control.
In the wild
Asprey bootstrapped Bulletproof to $27 million in revenue and approached investors because rapid sales required roughly $3 million of coffee inventory. The investors offered $8 million at a $40 million valuation. He accepted after explicitly recognising that the money could expand reach while eventually costing control.
→ The raise accelerated growth and preserved unusually high founder equity at the time, though it did not prevent later removal from the board.
A bootstrapped manufacturer repeatedly sells out and loses confirmed wholesale orders because one production line is full. It raises only after documenting the order backlog, uses the money for added capacity, and negotiates while existing cash flow still allows it to walk away.
→ Capital removes a measured growth constraint without making the company accept survival terms.
Common mistakes
Raising to discover demand
Capital can fund activity without proving customers want the product. Validate the market before using money to scale it.
Ignoring the disagreement case
Investors may support the founder while interests align and exert control when direction changes. Governance must be evaluated before the conflict.
Waiting until desperate
A company that urgently needs cash has fewer credible alternatives and weaker power to reject harmful terms.
Is it for you?
Best for
It is best for revenue-generating companies with a specific capital-intensive bottleneck and meaningful growth momentum.
Not ideal for
It is not ideal for founders who have not validated demand or who do not want the governance and control trade-offs attached to investment.
From the transcript
“I raised my first round when I was doing $27 million in revenue. I bootstrapped it until then.”
“I just need $3 million of coffee inventory because I'm I'm selling so fast. I can't get enough coffee.”
“I raised when I was in rapid growth and I didn't really need the money. I need it for growth, but I wasn't desperate.”
From the episode
Episode 451: Dave Asprey: Marketing Secrets That Built a $20 Billion Biohacking Industry
Dave Asprey