Power Posing Was Challenged, Not Simply Debunked
The conversation rejects a simplistic verdict on power posing. Van Edwards notes fuzzy science and questions the leap to hormonal changes, while also pointing out that Amy Cuddy has defended the work and that readers should examine the rebuttal before deciding.
- Some elements of the original science were challenged
- Amy Cuddy has published a defense of the research
- Claims about testosterone were the largest leap
- A binary debunked-or-proven label loses important nuance
“it hasn't been totally debunked. There was some fuzzy science in there”
“I don't know how accurate it is that power posing completely changes your testosterone”